Modulation Rate and Quenching Factor
- Irene Bolognino
- Peter McNamara
- Madeleine Zurowski (Deactivated)
- Elisabetta Barberio
Figure/Plot | Description |
|---|---|
| Quenching factor spectra window |
| Assuming detectors have the same QF (either the solid or dotted lines) |
| Assuming detectors have different QFs |
| Observed modulation rates updated with the newest ANAIS’ results
[1] PPNP 114, 103810 (2020 [2] PRD 106, 052005 (2022) [3] arxiv 2404.17348 |
| Collection of observed modulation rates by NaI experiments (+global average) as of the end of 2021 (in svg and png). The light bands indicate 1sigma uncertainty and the darker bands 2sigma. Values are: 2-6 keV region DAMA [1]: 0.0095 +/- 0.0008 dru COSINE [2]: 0.0050 +/- 0.0047 dru ANAIS [3]: 0.0003 +/- 0.0037 dru Weighted av: 0.0090 +/- 0.0008 dru 1-6 keV region DAMA [1]: 0.0105 +/- 0.0011 dru COSINE [2]: 0.0067 +/- 0.0042 dru ANAIS [3]: -0.0034 +/- 0.0042 dru Weighted av: 0.0094 +/- 0.0010 dru [1] Bernabei et al. PPNP114 103810 (2020) [2] Adhikari et al. arxiv:2111.08863 [3] Amare et al. PRD 103, 102005 (2021) |
| Similar to above in the 1-6 keV region, but we include the observed rate for a selection of different quenching factors and the same DM model. Purpose is to demonstrate how much an observation might change given different crystal dependent quenching factors. For this mass and cross section, results are produced ranging an order of magnitude, allowing for observations within 1sigma of both ANAIS and DAMA, assuming particular crystal QFs.
If using please cite M. J. Zurowski IDM2022. |
| R. Bernabei, et al., Nuclear Physics and Atomic Energy 19(4), 307 (2018). DOI 10.15407/jnpae2018.04.307 |